Fleet Impression Change example - Full Wraps

Parent Account Name

 

PLACE NAME

FRAME MEDIA NAME

5+_Impressions_2021R1_ (Geopath)

 5+ Avg Wkly Impressions (TAB)

Clear Channel

San Diego Metropolitan Transit System ElCajonYard Garage

Full Wrap

                                                  70,949

                                         125,243

Clear Channel

San Diego Metropolitan Transit System ElCajonYard Garage

Full Side (DS)

                                                  61,126

                                           40,083

Clear Channel

San Diego Metropolitan Transit System ElCajonYard Garage

Full Back

                                                  14,818

                                           28,224

Clear Channel

San Diego Metropolitan Transit System ElCajonYard Garage

Full Side (PS)

                                                    7,715

                                           40,083

Clear Channel

San Diego Metropolitan Transit System ElCajonYard Garage

FS+FS+FB

                                                  83,659

                                          108,390

 

Both data sets show Age 5+ average weekly impressions.

The impressions for Full Wrap have been updated from 125,243 to 70,949 from the TAB methodology to the current Geopath methodology, respectively.

The previous methodology reported driver side and passenger side as weight-averaged inventory. When adding up the passenger side full side, driver side full side, and the full back, the total impressions equaled 108,390. A full wrap at 125,343 was rated to deliver more impressions than the sum of its parts. This was due to circulation being duplicated for the placements of the vehicle.

The current Geopath methodology recognizes the total available circulation. The 2021R1 data shows a total of 83,659 impressions. Vehicular audience passing the the bus would see a single larger ad, as would the pedestrian audience.

Geopath Circulation Summary

Circulation

Full Wrap

DS Full Side

PS Full Side

Full Back

Pedestrian

           13,067

            6,534

           6,534

      6,534

Forward Vehicular

              8,434

            7,090

           1,343

      8,434

Reverse Vehicular

           59,798

         59,798

 

 

 

 

The Full Wrap vs. a Full Side

Audience

Full Wrap

Full Side

Pedestrian

Total circulation

Half of circulation

Forward Vehicular

Perpendicular read dwell

Parallel read dwell

Reverse Vehicular

=

=

 

Pedestrian and forward and reverse vehicular circulation are measured. Visibility adjustments are applied. In the case of the TAB full wrap, the full wrap was duplicating circulation. The Geopath full wrap accounts for additional impressions from pedestrians and additional dwell time due to perpendicular read.

 

Related pages